Demystifying Agile

There are a lot of blanket statements made about agile from both sides. Proponents say “agile is a silver bullet.” Detractors decry agile as complete chaos. Of course, neither of those ends of the spectrum are very accurate. But it can take folks a long time to arrive at that realization. Recovering project manager Andrew Makar writes about this experience on a recent article on the Gantthead website, titled “Agile Myths Debunked.” In it, he recounts how, several years ago, he and a colleague shared a laugh over a vendor championing “extreme programming.” Now that agile and its engineering practices have grown up quite a bit more, Makar remarks, “I’m not laughing anymore.” In the article, he goes on to list four major misconceptions he had about agile—There’s no documentation in agile! There’s no planning in agile!, etc.—and, one by one, explain how he’s seen those myths debunked through real world experience. I’m not sure any experienced agile practitioner will find much here that will surprise them, but that’s hardly why it’s a good read. Instead, it’s satisfying to step back and consider how far agile methodologies have advanced. Truly, it wasn’t very long ago that these types of criticisms were leveled at agile and, in an article like Makar’s, they’re held up as evidence of how far our thinking on the topic has come. What do you think? Have you seen the acceptance of agile methods and techniques grow in acceptance in recent years? Or do you perceive that folks are still clinging to the “myths” Makar outlines?

Add new comment

Restricted HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a href hreflang> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote cite> <code> <ul type> <ol start type> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h2 id> <h3 id> <h4 id> <h5 id> <h6 id>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.